be his mother, and the older was likely her mother. Both
"It is a well-known fact," says Professor Marsh, "that the Spanish discoverers of America discovered no horses on this continent, and that the modern horse (Equus caballus, Linn.) was subsequently introduced from the Old World. It is, however, not so generally known that these animals had formerly been abundant here, and that long before, in tertiary time, near relatives of the horse, and probably his ancestors, existed in the far West in countless numbers and in a marvellous variety of forms. The remains of equine mammals, now known from the tertiary and quaternary deposits of this country, already represent more than double the number of genera and species hitherto found in the strata of the eastern hemisphere, and hence afford most important aid in tracing out the genealogy of the horses still existing.
"The animals of this group which lived in America during the three diversions of the tertiary period were especially numerous in the Rocky Mountain regions, and their remains are well preserved in the old lake basins which then covered so much of that country. The most ancient of these lakes--which extended over a considerable part of the present territories of Wyoming and Utah--remained so long in eocene times that the mud and sand, slowly deposited in it, accumulated to more than a mile in vertical thickness. In these deposits vast numbers of tropical animals were entombed, and here the oldest equine remains occur, four species of which have been described. These belong to the genus Orohippus (Marsh), and are all of a diminutive size, hardly bigger than a fox. The skeletons of these animals resemble that of the horse in many respects, much more indeed than any other existing species, but, instead of the single toe on each foot, so characteristic of all modern equines, the various species of Orohippus had four toes before and three behind, all of which reached the ground. The skull, too, was proportionately shorter, and the orbit was not enclosed behind by a bridge of bone. There were fifty four teeth in all, and the premolars were larger than the molars. The crowns of these teeth were very short. The canine teeth were developed in both sexes, and the incisors did not have the "mark" which indicates the age of the modern horse. The radius and ulna were separate, and the latter was entire through the whole length. The tibia and fibula were distinct. In the forefoot all the digits except the pollex, or first, were well developed. The third digit is the largest, and its close resemblance to that of the horse is clearly marked. The terminal phalanx, or coffin-bone, has a shallow median bone in front, as in many species of this group in the later tertiary. The fourth digit exceeds the second in size, and the second is much the shortest of all. Its metacarpal bone is considerably curved outward. In the hind-foot of this genus there are but three digits. The fourth metatarsal is much larger than the second.
"The larger number of equine mammals now known from the tertiary deposits of this country, and their regular distributions through the subdivisions of this formation, afford a good opportunity to ascertain the probable descent of the modern horse. The American representative of the latter is the extinct Equus fraternus (Leidy), a species almost, if not wholly, identical with the Old World Equus caballus (Linnaeus), to which our recent horse belongs. Huxley has traced successfully the later genealogy of the horse through European extinct forms, but the line in America was probably a more direct one, and the record is more complete. Taking, then, as the extreme of a series, Orohippus agilis (Marsh), from the eocene, and Equus fraternus (Leidy), from the quaternary, intermediate forms may be intercalated with considerable certainty from thirty or more well-marked species that lived in the intervening periods. The natural line of descent would seem to be through the following genera: Orohippus, of the eocene; Miohippus and Anchitherium, of the miocene; Anchippus, Hipparion, Protohippus, Phohippus, of the pliocene; and Equus, quaternary and recent.
The most marked changes undergone by the successive equine genera are as follows: First, increase in size; second, increase in speed, through concentration of limb bones; third, elongation of head and neck, and modifications of skull. The eocene Orohippus was the size of a fox. Miohippus and Anchitherium, from the miocene, were about as large as a sheep. Hipparion and Pliohippus, of the pliocene, equalled the ass in height; while the size of the quaternary Equus was fully up to that of a modern horse.
"The increase of speed was equally well marked, and was a direct result of the gradual formation of the limbs. The latter were slowly concentrated by the reduction of their lateral elements and enlargement of the axial bone, until the force exerted by each limb came to act directly through its axis in the line of motion. This concentration is well seen--e.g., in the fore-limb. There was, first, a change in the scapula and humerus, especially in the latter, which facilitated motion in one line only; second, an expansion of the radius and reduction of the ulna, until the former alone remained entire and effective; third, a shortening of all the carpal bones and enlargement of the median ones, insuring a firmer wrist; fourth, an increase of size of the third digit, at the expense of those of each side, until the former alone supported the limb.
"Such is, in brief, a general outline of the more marked changes that seemed to have produced in America the highly specialized modern Equus from his diminutive four-toed predecessor, the eocene Orohippus. The line of descent appears to have been direct, and the remains now known supply every important intermediate form. It is, of course, impossible to say with certainty through which of the three-toed genera of the pliocene that lived together the succession came. It is not impossible that the latter species, which appear generically identical, are the descendants of more distinct pliocene types, as the persistent tendency in all the earlier forms was in the same direction. Considering the remarkable development of the group through the tertiary period, and its existence even later, it seems very strange that none of the species should have survived, and that we are indebted for our present horse to the Old World."
These and such-like revelations have come to light in our own time--are, indeed, still being disclosed. Needless to say, no index of any sort now attempts to conceal them; yet something has been accomplished towards the same end by the publication of the discoveries in Smithsonian bulletins and in technical memoirs of government surveys. Fortunately, however, the results have been rescued from that partial oblivion by such interpreters as Professors Huxley and Cope, so the unscientific public has been allowed to gain at least an inkling of the wonderful progress of paleontology in our generation.
The writings of Huxley in particular epitomize the record. In 1862 he admitted candidly that the paleontological record as then known, so far as it bears on the doctrine of progressive development, negatives that doctrine. In 1870 he was able to "soften somewhat the Brutus-like severity" of his former verdict, and to assert that the results of recent researches seem "to leave a clear balance in favor of the doctrine of the evolution of living forms one from another." Six years later, when reviewing the work of Marsh in America and of Gaudry in Pikermi, he declared that, "on the evidence of paleontology, the evolution of many existing forms of animal life from their predecessors is no longer an hypothesis, but an historical fact." In 1881 he asserted that the evidence gathered in the previous decade had been so unequivocal that, had the transmutation hypothesis not existed, "the paleontologist would have had to invent it."
- fowls, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and cattle; the order
- to die, but was caught up to heaven one day, added Lys,
- such a pipe requires ten minutes' close attention. To smoke
- It's due to himself. To your happiness, Marianne; and
- that she might honestly give him the answer that he demanded.
- Sorgue? And who was Jacques Sorgue? I never read his book.
- listens to the first low rumor of an organ. All at once
- manuscript back to Durand. The gendarme took it and slipped
- lamp was incapable of penetrating the fog. He groped with
- where Max Fortin stands, and do you know what he answered?
- I rolled a stone down instead of the skull, I muttered
- of Groix to visit her husband in the fort. When the fort
- resources were at an end; it must be another's work to
- into needlelike points. Fortin leaned against the cliff,
- and ghosts. Hey! what the—what the devil's the matter
- Where can she be? I wondered, Môme came sneaking
- in an iron sluice gate. The Eurasian had passed it, but
- No, you needn't come to be babied and wept over; Lys can
- in St. Gildas, said Max Fortin. Even Froissart speaks
- Exactly—the pig! piped the mayor of St. Gildas. Jean
- He ducked rapidly, almost touching the muddy water with
- was lying on the edge of the pit, exactly where it had
- lizards from the gorse, little gray mullets to swim in
- back to St. Gildas when his remains are disturbed. I—I
- then directed the ray of the little lamp toward the further
- There was a man, said Le Bihan angrily, an Englishman,
- to fire at a priest unless his face was concealed. The
- of it in his commentaries on Jacques Sorgue's Chronicles.
- to peer through the fog ahead, he turned and descended
- It suits, said Tregunc, fumbling for his pipe in a silly
- in St. Gildas, said Max Fortin. Even Froissart speaks
- No, it isn't! I answered, much exasperated, and deliberately
- possessed for him. So it came that his was a familiar figure
- When I entered my garden I saw Môme sprawling on
- girl who was in the habit of rowing across from the island
- is there in that book. Do you care to read it? No? Shall
- of an ancient tertiary epoch) of which these islands are
- Trevec who married an Yves Trevec of St. Gildas——
- How much do you earn every year, Jean Marie? I asked,
- manner of his death was as follows: By order of the most
- Max gaining upon her, now, at every stride. There was a
- still facing it, one, ten, twenty paces, my eyes almost
- Nonsense, said I; we need a gardener; you said so yourself,
- to aid him in discovering the password to the fort. This
- the great caravan routes entering the Sahara from the south.
- What rot! I said. Do you believe it was really written
- to myself. Then with the butt of my gun I pushed the skull
- of human bones. Beside these was a mound of broken, rusted
- resting the electric lamp upon one of the little ebony
- I? No, not about a giant-killer, but I know all about